addressof
overload unneededSection: 20.2.11 [specialized.addressof] Status: C++11 Submitter: Howard Hinnant Opened: 2009-01-16 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [specialized.addressof].
View all issues with C++11 status.
Discussion:
20.2.11 [specialized.addressof] specifies:
template <ObjectType T> T* addressof(T& r); template <ObjectType T> T* addressof(T&& r);
The two signatures are ambiguous when the argument is an lvalue. The second signature seems not useful: what does it mean to take the address of an rvalue?
[ Post Summit: ]
Recommend Review.
[ Batavia (2009-05): ]
We agree with the proposed resolution. Move to Tentatively Ready.
[ 2009-11-18 Moved from Pending WP to WP. Confirmed in N3000. ]
Proposed resolution:
Change 20.2.11 [specialized.addressof]:
template <ObjectType T> T* addressof(T& r);template <ObjectType T> T* addressof(T&& r);