lazy_split_view::outer-iterator::value_type
should not provide default constructorSection: 25.7.16.4 [range.lazy.split.outer.value] Status: WP Submitter: Hewill Kang Opened: 2023-11-11 Last modified: 2024-04-02
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [range.lazy.split.outer.value].
View all issues with WP status.
Discussion:
After P2325, there is no reason for lazy_split_view::outer-iterator::value_type
to provide a default constructor, which only leads to unexpected behavior:
#include <ranges>
constexpr int arr[] = {42};
constexpr auto split = arr | std::views::lazy_split(0);
static_assert(!std::ranges::range_value_t<decltype(split)>{}); // UB, dereferencing a null pointer
Also, the other constructor should be private because it makes no sense for the user to construct it arbitrarily, which is not the intention.
[2024-03-11; Reflector poll]
Set status to Tentatively Ready after six votes in favour during reflector poll.
[Tokyo 2024-03-23; Status changed: Voting → WP.]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4964.
Modify 25.7.16.4 [range.lazy.split.outer.value], class split_view::outer-iterator::value_type
synopsis,
as indicated:
namespace std::ranges { template<input_range V, forward_range Pattern> requires view<V> && view<Pattern> && indirectly_comparable<iterator_t<V>, iterator_t<Pattern>, ranges::equal_to> && (forward_range<V> || tiny-range<Pattern>) template<bool Const> struct lazy_split_view<V, Pattern>::outer-iterator<Const>::value_type : view_interface<value_type> { private: outer-iterator i_ = outer-iterator(); // exposition only constexpr explicit value_type(outer-iterator i); // exposition only public:value_type() = default;constexpr explicit value_type(outer-iterator i);constexpr inner-iterator<Const> begin() const; constexpr default_sentinel_t end() const noexcept; }; }