Section: 28.3.3.1.2.1 [locale.category] Status: CD1 Submitter: P.J. Plauger, Nathan Myers Opened: 2001-10-23 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [locale.category].
View all issues with CD1 status.
Discussion:
In 28.3.3.1.2.1 [locale.category] paragraph 1, the category members
are described as bitmask elements. In fact, the bitmask requirements
in 16.3.3.3.3 [bitmask.types] don't seem quite right: none
and all are bitmask constants, not bitmask elements.
In particular, the requirements for none interact poorly
with the requirement that the LC_* constants from the C library must
be recognizable as C++ locale category constants. LC_* values should
not be mixed with these values to make category values.
We have two options for the proposed resolution. Informally:
option 1 removes the requirement that LC_* values be recognized as
category arguments. Option 2 changes the category type so that this
requirement is implementable, by allowing none to be some
value such as 0x1000 instead of 0.
Nathan writes: "I believe my proposed resolution [Option 2] merely re-expresses the status quo more clearly, without introducing any changes beyond resolving the DR.
Proposed resolution:
Replace the first two paragraphs of 28.3.3.1.2 [locale.types] with:
typedef int category;Valid category values include the
localemember bitmask elementscollate,ctype,monetary,numeric,time, andmessages, each of which represents a single locale category. In addition,localemember bitmask constantnoneis defined as zero and represents no category. And locale member bitmask constantallis defined such that the expression(collate | ctype | monetary | numeric | time | messages | all) == allis
true, and represents the union of all categories. Further the expression(X | Y), whereXandYeach represent a single category, represents the union of the two categories.
localemember functions expecting acategoryargument require one of thecategoryvalues defined above, or the union of two or more such values. Such acategoryargument identifies a set of locale categories. Each locale category, in turn, identifies a set of locale facets, including at least those shown in Table 51:
[Curaçao: need input from locale experts.]
Rationale:
The LWG considered, and rejected, an alternate proposal (described as "Option 2" in the discussion). The main reason for rejecting it was that library implementors were concerened about implementation difficult, given that getting a C++ library to work smoothly with a separately written C library is already a delicate business. Some library implementers were also concerned about the issue of adding extra locale categories.
Option 2:
Replace the first paragraph of 28.3.3.1.2 [locale.types] with:Valid category values include the enumerated values. In addition, the result of applying commutative operators | and & to any two valid values is valid, and results in the setwise union and intersection, respectively, of the argument categories. The values
allandnoneare defined such that for any valid valuecat, the expressions(cat | all == all),(cat & all == cat),(cat | none == cat)and(cat & none == none)are true. For non-equal valuescat1andcat2of the remaining enumerated values,(cat1 & cat2 == none)is true. For any valid categoriescat1andcat2, the result of(cat1 & ~cat2)is valid, and equals the setwise union of those categories found incat1but not found incat2. [Footnote: it is not required thatallequal the setwise union of the other enumerated values; implementations may add extra categories.]