stop_token's operator!=Section: 32.3.4 [stoptoken] Status: C++20 Submitter: Casey Carter Opened: 2019-08-06 Last modified: 2021-02-25
Priority: 0
View all issues with C++20 status.
Discussion:
In the shiny new world of the future, we need not declare overloads of operator!= that
return !(x == y); the rewrite rule in 12.2.2.3 [over.match.oper] para 3.4.3
achieves the same effect. Consequently, we should not declare such unnecessary
operator!= overloads. The synopsis of class stop_token in 32.3.4 [stoptoken]
declares exactly such an operator!= friend which should be struck.
[01-2020 Moved to Tentatively Ready after 5 positive votes on the reflector.]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4830.
Modify 32.3.4 [stoptoken], class stop_token synopsis, as indicated:
namespace std {
class stop_token {
public:
[…]
[[nodiscard]] friend bool operator==(const stop_token& lhs, const stop_token& rhs) noexcept;
[[nodiscard]] friend bool operator!=(const stop_token& lhs, const stop_token& rhs) noexcept;
friend void swap(stop_token& lhs, stop_token& rhs) noexcept;
};
}
Modify [stoptoken.cmp] and [stoptoken.special] as indicated:
32.3.3.3 Non-member functions
Comparisons[stoptoken.nonmemberscmp][[nodiscard]] bool operator==(const stop_token& lhs, const stop_token& rhs) noexcept;-1- Returns:
trueiflhsandrhshave ownership of the same stop state or if bothlhsandrhsdo not have ownership of a stop state; otherwisefalse.[[nodiscard]] bool operator!=(const stop_token& lhs, const stop_token& rhs) noexcept;
-2- Returns:!(lhs==rhs).
32.3.3.4 Specialized algorithms [stoptoken.special]friend void swap(stop_token& x, stop_token& y) noexcept;-1- Effects: Equivalent to:
x.swap(y).