Boolean
's expression requirements are ordered inconsistentlySection: 24.7 [iterator.range] Status: C++20 Submitter: Casey Carter Opened: 2019-06-06 Last modified: 2021-02-25
Priority: 0
View other active issues in [iterator.range].
View all other issues in [iterator.range].
View all issues with C++20 status.
Discussion:
For consistency of presentation, we should group and order the
&&
and ||
expression requirements similarly to the
==
and !=
expression requirements. Note that the suggested
change is not quite editorial: evaluation of requirements for satisfaction has
short-circuiting behavior, so the declaration order of requirements is
normatively significant in general.
[2019-06-13; Priority to 0 and Status to Tentatively Ready after seven positive votes on the reflector.]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4810.
Modify [concept.boolean] as indicated:
[…] { b1 } -> ConvertibleTo<bool>; { !b1 } -> ConvertibleTo<bool>;{ b1 && a } -> Same<bool>;{ b1 || a } -> Same<bool>;{ b1 && b2 } -> Same<bool>; { b1 && a } -> Same<bool>; { a && b2 } -> Same<bool>; { b1 || b2 } -> Same<bool>; { b1 || a } -> Same<bool>; { a || b2 } -> Same<bool>; { b1 == b2 } -> ConvertibleTo<bool>; { b1 == a } -> ConvertibleTo<bool>; { a == b2 } -> ConvertibleTo<bool>; { b1 != b2 } -> ConvertibleTo<bool>; { b1 != a } -> ConvertibleTo<bool>; { a != b2 } -> ConvertibleTo<bool>; };