fpos
equality comparison unspecifiedSection: 31.5.3.3 [fpos.operations] Status: C++23 Submitter: Jonathan Wakely Opened: 2018-06-04 Last modified: 2023-11-22
Priority: 4
View all other issues in [fpos.operations].
View all issues with C++23 status.
Discussion:
The fpos
requirements do not give any idea what is compared by operator==
(even after Daniel's
P0759R1 paper). I'd like something to make it clear that return true;
is not a valid implementation of operator==(const fpos<T>&, const fpos<T>&)
. Maybe in the
P(o)
row state that "p == P(o)
" and "p != P(o + 1)
", i.e. two fpos
objects
constructed from the same streamoff
values are equal, and two fpos
objects constructed from two
different streamoff
values are not equal.
[2018-06-23 after reflector discussion]
Priority set to 4
[2022-05-01; Daniel comments and provides wording]
The proposed wording does intentionally not use a form involving addition or subtraction to prevent the need
for extra wording that ensures that this computed value is well-defined. According to 31.2.2 [stream.types],
streamoff
is a signed basic integral type, so we know what equality means for such values.
Previous resolution [SUPERSEDED]:
This wording is relative to N4910.
Modify in 31.5.3.3 [fpos.operations] as indicated:
[Drafting note: The return type specification of
operator==
should be resolved in sync with D2167R2; see also LWG 2114.]
(1.1) — […]
[…]
(1.5) —
o
ando2
referstoavalues of typestreamoff
orconst streamoff
.
Table 119: Position type requirements [tab:fpos.operations] Expression Return type Operational
semanticsAssertion/note
pre-/post-condition… P p(o);
P p = o;Effects: Value-initializes the
state object.
Postconditions:p == P(o)
istrue
.… O(p)
streamoff
converts to offset
P(O(p)) == p
p == q
convertible to bool
Remarks: For any two values o
ando2
, if
p
is obtained fromo
converted toP
or from a copy
of suchP
value and ifq
is obtained fromo2
converted toP
or from a copy of suchP
value, then
bool(p == q)
istrue
only ifo == o2
istrue
.p != q
convertible to bool
!(p == q)
…
[2022-11-02; Daniel comments and improves wording]
LWG discussion of P2167R2
has shown preference to require that the equality operations of fpos
should be specified to have type
bool
instead of being specified as "convertible to bool
". This has been reflected in the most recent
paper revision P2167R3. The below wording changes
follow that direction to reduce the wording mismatch to a minimum.
[2022-11-02; LWG telecon]
Moved to Ready. For: 6, Against: 0, Neutral: 0
[2022-11-12 Approved at November 2022 meeting in Kona. Status changed: Voting → WP.]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4917.
Modify in 31.5.3.3 [fpos.operations] as indicated:
(1.1) — […]
[…]
(1.5) —
o
ando2
referstoavalues of typestreamoff
orconst streamoff
.
Table 124: Position type requirements [tab:fpos.operations] Expression Return type Operational
semanticsAssertion/note
pre-/post-condition… P p(o);
P p = o;Effects: Value-initializes the
state object.
Postconditions:p == P(o)
istrue
.… O(p)
streamoff
converts to offset
P(O(p)) == p
p == q
bool
Remarks: For any two values o
ando2
, if
p
is obtained fromo
converted toP
or from a copy
of suchP
value and ifq
is obtained fromo2
converted toP
or from a copy of suchP
value, then
p == q
istrue
only ifo == o2
istrue
.p != q
convertible tobool
!(p == q)
…