forward_list::merge behavior unclear when passed *thisSection: 23.3.7.6 [forward.list.ops] Status: C++23 Submitter: Tim Song Opened: 2018-03-19 Last modified: 2023-11-22
Priority: 3
View all other issues in [forward.list.ops].
View all issues with C++23 status.
Discussion:
LWG 300 changed list::merge to be a no-op when passed *this, but there's
no equivalent rule for forward_list::merge.
Presumably the forward_list proposal predated the adoption of LWG 300's PR and was never updated
for the change. Everything in the discussion of that issue applies mutatis mutandis to the current
specification of forward_list::merge.
[2018-06-18 after reflector discussion]
Priority set to 3
[2019-07-30 Tim provides updated PR]
Per the comments during issue prioritization, the new PR tries to synchronize the wording
between list::merge and forward_list::merge.
Previous resolution [SUPERSEDED]:
This wording is relative to N4727.
Edit [forwardlist.ops] as indicated:
void merge(forward_list& x); void merge(forward_list&& x); template<class Compare> void merge(forward_list& x, Compare comp); template<class Compare> void merge(forward_list&& x, Compare comp);-20- Requires:
-21- Effects: If*thisandxare both sorted with respect to the comparatoroperator<(for the first two overloads) orcomp(for the last two overloads), andget_allocator() == x.get_allocator()istrue.addressof(x) == this, does nothing. Otherwise, mMerges the two sorted ranges[begin(), end())and[x.begin(), x.end()). The result is a range that is sorted with respect to the comparatoroperator<(for the first two overloads) orcomp(for the last two overloads).xis empty after the merge. If an exception is thrown other than by a comparison there are no effects. Pointers and references to the moved elements ofxnow refer to those same elements but as members of*this. Iterators referring to the moved elements will continue to refer to their elements, but they now behave as iterators into*this, not intox. -22- Remarks: Stable (16.4.6.8 [algorithm.stable]). The behavior is undefined ifget_allocator() != x.get_allocator(). -23- Complexity: At mostdistance(begin(), end()) + distance(x.begin(), x.end()) - 1comparisons ifaddressof(x) != this; otherwise, no comparisons are performed.
[2021-05-22 Tim syncs wording to the current working draft]
[2022-01-31; Reflector poll]
Set status to Tentatively Ready after six votes in favour during reflector poll.
[2022-02-10 Approved at February 2022 virtual plenary. Status changed: Tentatively Ready → WP.]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4901.
Edit 23.3.7.6 [forward.list.ops] as indicated:
void merge(forward_list& x); void merge(forward_list&& x); template<class Compare> void merge(forward_list& x, Compare comp); template<class Compare> void merge(forward_list&& x, Compare comp);-?- Let
-24- Preconditions:compbeless<>{}for the first two overloads.*thisandxare both sorted with respect to the comparatoroperator<(for the first two overloads) orcomp(for the last two overloads), andget_allocator() == x.get_allocator()istrue. -25- Effects: Ifaddressof(x) == this, there are no effects. Otherwise, mMerges the two sorted ranges[begin(), end())and[x.begin(), x.end()). The result is a range that is sorted with respect to the comparatorcomp.Pointers and references to the moved elements ofxis empty after the merge. If an exception is thrown other than by a comparison there are no effects.xnow refer to those same elements but as members of*this. Iterators referring to the moved elements will continue to refer to their elements, but they now behave as iterators into*this, not intox. -26- Complexity: At mostdistance(begin(), end()) + distance(x.begin(), x.end()) - 1comparisons ifaddressof(x) != this; otherwise, no comparisons are performed. -27- Remarks: Stable (16.4.6.8 [algorithm.stable]). Ifaddressof(x) != this,xis empty after the merge. No elements are copied by this operation. If an exception is thrown other than by a comparison there are no effects.
Edit 23.3.11.5 [list.ops] as indicated:
void merge(list& x); void merge(list&& x); template<class Compare> void merge(list& x, Compare comp); template<class Compare> void merge(list&& x, Compare comp);-?- Let
-26- Preconditions:compbeless<>{}for the first two overloads.Both the list and the argument list shall be*thisandxare both sorted with respect to the comparatoroperator<(for the first two overloads) orcomp(for the last two overloads), andget_allocator() == x.get_allocator()istrue. -27- Effects: Ifaddressof(x) == this,does nothing; othere are no effects. Otherwise, merges the two sorted ranges[begin(), end())and[x.begin(), x.end()). The result is a rangein which the elements will be sorted in non-decreasing order according to the ordering defined bythat is sorted with respect to the comparatorcomp; that is, for every iteratori, in the range other than the first, the conditioncomp(*i, *(i - 1))will befalsecomp. Pointers and references to the moved elements ofxnow refer to those same elements but as members of*this. Iterators referring to the moved elements will continue to refer to their elements, but they now behave as iterators into*this, not intox. -28- Complexity: At mostsize() + x.size() - 1applications ofcomparisons ifcompaddressof(x) != this; otherwise, noapplications ofcomparisons are performed.compIf an exception is thrown other than by a comparison there are no effects.-29- Remarks: Stable (16.4.6.8 [algorithm.stable]). Ifaddressof(x) != this,the range[x.begin(), x.end())xis empty after the merge. No elements are copied by this operation. If an exception is thrown other than by a comparison there are no effects.