variant
should require Destructible
typesSection: 22.6.3 [variant.variant] Status: NAD Submitter: Agustín K-ballo Bergé Opened: 2017-05-31 Last modified: 2020-09-06
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [variant.variant].
View all issues with NAD status.
Discussion:
The state of a variant
is not specified if an exception is thrown during
the destruction of the active alternative. Exceptions should not be
allowed to escape during destruction of an object used as a variant
alternative. Otherwise, it should be specified that the variant
object
might not hold a value.
[2017-07 Toronto Monday issue prioritization]
NAD; [res.on.functions]/2 already gives us this guarantee.
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4659.
Edit 22.6.3 [variant.variant] as indicated:
-2- All types in
Types...
shall be (possibly cv-qualified) object types that are not arrays, and shall satisfy the requirements ofDestructible
(Table 27).