std::visit
misspecifiedSection: 22.6.7 [variant.visit] Status: C++20 Submitter: Tim Song Opened: 2017-05-31 Last modified: 2021-02-25
Priority: 2
View all other issues in [variant.visit].
View all issues with C++20 status.
Discussion:
[variant.visit]/1 correctly uses "type and value category", but then
p3 describes the return type of visit
to be "the common type of all
possible INVOKE
expressions of the Effects: element."
The type of an expression is never a reference type, due to [expr]/5 removing the
referenceness "prior to any further analysis", so this wording as
written says that visit
always returns a non-reference type, which is
presumably not the intent.
[2017-07 Toronto Monday issue prioritization]
Priority 2; Matt to provide wording
[2018-01-11, Thomas Köppe comments and suggests wording]
The return type of std::visit
(originating by P0088R3
accepted during the Oulo 2016 meeting) is currently misspecified and refers only to the common
type of all the possible visitation calls, without attention to the value category. This
seems unintended, and we should preserve the value category.
[2017-01-24, Daniel comments]
This issue should be reviewed in common with LWG 3052.
[ 2018-02-23 Moved to Tentatively Ready after 6 positive votes on c++std-lib. ]
[2018-06 Rapperswil: Adopted]
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4727.
Modify 22.6.7 [variant.visit] as indicated:
template<class Visitor, class... Variants> constexpr see below visit(Visitor&& vis, Variants&&... vars);[…]
-3- Returns:e(m)
, wherem
is the pack for whichmi
isvarsi.index()
for all0 <= i < n
. The return type isthe type ofe(m)
decltype(e(m))
. […]