2832. §[fpos.operations] strange requirement for P(i)

Section: [fpos.operations] Status: Resolved Submitter: Jens Maurer Opened: 2016-11-24 Last modified: 2020-05-12 16:48:31 UTC

Priority: 3

View all other issues in [fpos.operations].

View all issues with Resolved status.


This is from editorial issue #1031.

The first row in Table 112 "Position type requirements" talks about the expression P(i) and then has an assertion p == P(i). However, there are no constraints on p other than being of type P, so (on the face of it) this seems to require that operator== on P always returns true, which is non-sensical.

[2017-01-27 Telecon]

Priority 3

[2019-03-17; Daniel comments]

With the acceptance of P0759R1 at the Rapperswil 2018 meeting this issue should be closed as Resolved.

[2020-05-12; Reflector discussions]

Resolved by P0759R1.


Resolved by P0759R1.

Proposed resolution: