Section: 184.108.40.206 [optional.observe] Status: Open Submitter: Richard Smith Opened: 2016-11-24 Last modified: 2020-06-13 16:37:23 UTC
View other active issues in [optional.observe].
View all other issues in [optional.observe].
View all issues with Open status.
After applying LWG 2740, we have:
constexpr const T* operator->() const; constexpr T* operator->();
-1- Requires: *this contains a value.-2- Returns: val. -3- Throws: Nothing. -4- Remarks: These functions shall be constexpr functions.
Paragraph 4 is completely superfluous. We already said these functions were constexpr in the synopsis. Can it be removed?
[Issues Telecon 16-Dec-2016]
Jonathan notes: Although Richard is correct, I suggest we don't strike the paragraph, so that we remember to fix it as part of 2833, when we know how to say this properly.
[2018-06 Rapperswil Thursday issues processing]
Status to Open; also see 7.7 [expr.const]/6 and 2289.
[2020-06-08 Nina Dinka Ranns comments]
The revised wording provided by LWG 2833 should resolve this issue as well.