variant
hash requirementsSection: 22.6.12 [variant.hash] Status: Resolved Submitter: Great Britain Opened: 2016-11-09 Last modified: 2020-09-06
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all issues with Resolved status.
Discussion:
Addresses GB 69
The paragraph is really trying to say two different things, and should be split into two paragraphs, using standard terminology.
Proposed change:
The first sentence should become a Requires: clause, as it dictates requirements to callers. The second sentence should be a Remarks: clause, at is a normative requirement on the implementation.[Issues Telecon 16-Dec-2016]
Resolved by the adoption of P0513R0.
Proposed resolution: