experimental::function::assign
should be removedSection: 4.2 [fund.ts.v2::func.wrap.func] Status: TS Submitter: Tim Song Opened: 2015-12-20 Last modified: 2017-07-30
Priority: 0
View all other issues in [fund.ts.v2::func.wrap.func].
View all issues with TS status.
Discussion:
Addresses: fund.ts.v2
Following the lead of LWG 2385, the assign(F&&, const A&)
member function template in
std::experimental::function
makes no sense (it causes undefined behavior unless the allocator passed compares equal
to the one already used by *this
) and should be removed.
[2016-02, Issues Telecon]
P0; move to Tentatively Ready.
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4562.
Edit 4.2 [fund.ts.v2::func.wrap.func], class template function
synopsis, as indicated:
namespace std { namespace experimental { inline namespace fundamentals_v2 { […] template<class R, class... ArgTypes> class function<R(ArgTypes...)> { public: […] void swap(function&);template<class F, class A> void assign(F&&, const A&);[…] }; […] } // namespace fundamentals_v2 } // namespace experimental […] } // namespace std