2513. Missing requirements for basic_string::value_type

Section: 23.1 [strings.general] Status: New Submitter: Jonathan Wakely Opened: 2015-06-26 Last modified: 2020-09-06 13:52:31 UTC

Priority: 4

View all other issues in [strings.general].

View all issues with New status.


The allocator-aware container requirements in Table 98 impose no MoveAssignable requirements on the value_type when propagate_on_container_move_assignment is true, because typically the container's storage would be moved by just exchanging some pointers.

However for a basic_string using the small string optimization move assignment may need to assign individual characters into the small string buffer, even when the allocator propagates.

The only requirement on the char-like objects stored in a basic_string are that they are non-array POD types and Destructible, which means that a POD type with a deleted move assignment operator should be usable in a basic_string, despite it being impossible to move assign:

#include <string>

struct odd_pod 
  odd_pod() = default;
  odd_pod& operator=(odd_pod&&) = delete;

static_assert(std::is_pod<odd_pod>::value, "POD");

int main()
  using S = std::basic_string<odd_pod>;
  S s;
  s = S{};       // fails

Using libstdc++ basic_string<odd_pod> cannot even be default-constructed because the constructor attempts to assign the null terminator to the first element of the small string buffer.

Similar problems exist with POD types with a deleted default constructor.

I believe that basic_string should require its value_type to be at least DefaultConstructible and MoveAssignable.

[2016-06, Oulu]

This should be resolved by P0178

Note: P0178 was sent back to LEWG in Oulu.

Proposed resolution: