1508. Rename packaged_task::operator bool()

Section: 33.10.10 [futures.task] Status: Resolved Submitter: INCITS Opened: 2010-08-25 Last modified: 2016-01-28 10:19:27 UTC

Priority: Not Prioritized

View all other issues in [futures.task].

View all issues with Resolved status.


Addresses US-201

packaged_task provides operator bool() to check whether an object has an associated asynchronous state. The various future types provide a member function valid() that does the same thing. The names of these members should be the same.

[ Resolution proposed by ballot comment: ]

Replaced the name packaged_task::operator bool() with packaged_task::valid() in the synopsis (33.10.10 [futures.task]/2) and the member function specification (before [futures.task.members]/15).

[ 2010-11-02 Daniel translates proposed wording changes into a proper proposed resolution and verified that no other places implicitly take advantage of packaged_task conversion to bool. ]

[Resolved in Batavia by accepting n3194. ]

Proposed resolution:

  1. Change 33.10.10 [futures.task]/2, class template packaged_task synopsis as indicated:
    template<class R, class... ArgTypes>
    class packaged_task<R(ArgTypes...)> {
      typedef R result_type;
      explicit operator bool valid() const;
  2. Change 33.10.10 [futures.task] before p. 15 as indicated:
    explicit operator bool valid() const;

    15 Returns: true only if *this has an associated asynchronous state.

    16 Throws: nothing.