1417. front/back on a zero-sized array should be undefined

Section: [array.zero] Status: C++11 Submitter: BSI Opened: 2010-08-25 Last modified: 2016-01-28 10:19:27 UTC

Priority: Not Prioritized

View all other issues in [array.zero].

View all issues with C++11 status.


Addresses GB-112

Should the effect of calling front/back on a zero-sized array really be implementation defined i.e. require the implementor to define behaviour?

[ Resolved in Rapperswil by a motion to directly apply the words from the ballot comment in N3102. ]

Proposed resolution:

Change "implementation defined" to "undefined"