monotonic_clockSection: 99 [time.clock.monotonic] Status: Resolved Submitter: BSI Opened: 2010-08-25 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [time.clock.monotonic].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Duplicate of: 1411
Discussion:
Addresses GB-107, DE-20
4.1 [intro.compliance] p.9 states that which conditionally
supported constructs are available should be provided in the
documentation for the implementation. This doesn't help programmers trying
to write portable code, as they must then rely on
implementation-specific means to determine the
availability of such constructs. In particular, the presence
or absence of std::chrono::monotonic_clock may require
different code paths to be selected. This is the only
conditionally-supported library facility, and differs from the
conditionally-supported language facilities in that it has
standard-defined semantics rather than implementation-defined
semantics.
[ Resolution proposed in ballot comment: ]
Provide feature test macro for determining the
presence of std::chrono::monotonic_clock. Add
_STDCPP_HAS_MONOTONIC_CLOCK to the
<chrono> header, which is defined if
monotonic_clock is present, and not defined if it is
not present.
[ 2010-11-01 Daniel comments: ]
Paper n3128 addresses this issue by replacing
monotonic_clockwithsteady_clock, which is not conditionally supported, so there is no need to detect it.
Proposed resolution:
This is resolved by n3191.