Section: 16 [library] Status: Dup Submitter: Switzerland Opened: 2010-08-25 Last modified: 2016-01-28 10:19:27 UTC
Priority: Not Prioritized
View other active issues in [library].
View all other issues in [library].
View all issues with Dup status.
Duplicate of: 1346
Discussion:
Addresses CH-17
The introduction of noexcept makes "Throws: Nothing" clauses looking strange.
[ Resolution proposed by ballot comment ]
Consider replacing "Throws: Nothing." clause by the respective noexcept specification.
Proposed resolution: