Section: 21.4.3 [ratio.ratio] Status: Resolved Submitter: Vicente Juan Botet Escribá Opened: 2009-12-07 Last modified: 2016-01-28
Priority: Not Prioritized
View all other issues in [ratio.ratio].
View all issues with Resolved status.
Discussion:
CopyConstruction and Assignment between ratio
s having the same
normalized form. Current
N3000
do not allows to copy-construct or assign ratio
instances of
ratio
classes having the same normalized form.
Two ratio
classes ratio<N1,D1>
and
ratio<N2,D2>
have the same normalized form if
ratio<N1, D1>::num == ratio<N2, D2>::num && ratio<N1, D1>::den == ratio<N2, D2>::den
This simple example
ratio<1,3> r1; ratio<3,9> r2; r1 = r2; // (1)
fails to compile in (1). Other example
ratio<1,3> r1; ratio_subtract<ratio<2,3>, ratio<1,3>>::type r2; r1 = r2;
The nested type of ratio_subtract<ratio<2,3>,
ratio<1,3>>
could be ratio<3,9>
so the compilation
could fail. It could also be ratio<1,3>
and the compilation
succeeds.
In 21.4.4 [ratio.arithmetic] 3 and similar clauses
3 The nested typedef
type
shall be a synonym forratio<T1, T2>
whereT1
has the valueR1::num * R2::den - R2::num * R1::den
andT2
has the valueR1::den * R2::den
.
the meaning of synonym let think that the result shall be a normalized
ratio
equivalent to ratio<T1, T2>
, but there is not an
explicit definition of what synonym means in this context.
Additionally we should add a typedef for accessing the normalized
ratio
, and change 21.4.4 [ratio.arithmetic] to return only this
normalized result.
[ 2010 Pittsburgh: ]
There is no consensus to add the converting copy constructor or converting copy assignment operator. However there was consensus to add the typedef.
Proposed wording modified. Original proposed wording preserved here. Moved to Review.
Make
ratio
default constructible, copy-constructible and assignable from anyratio
which has the same reduced form.Add to 21.4.3 [ratio.ratio] synopsis
template <intmax_t N, intmax_t D = 1> class ratio { public: static constexpr intmax_t num; static constexpr intmax_t den; typedef ratio<num, den> type; ratio() = default; template <intmax_t N2, intmax_t D2> ratio(const ratio<N2, D2>&); template <intmax_t N2, intmax_t D2> ratio& operator=(const ratio<N2, D2>&); };Add to 21.4.3 [ratio.ratio]:
Two ratio classes
ratio<N1,D1>
andratio<N2,D2>
have the same reduced form ifratio<N1,D1>::type
is the same type asratio<N2,D2>::type
Add a new section: [ratio.cons]
Construction and assignment [ratio.cons]
template <intmax_t N2, intmax_t D2> ratio(const ratio<N2, D2>& r);Effects: Constructs a
ratio
object.Remarks: This constructor shall not participate in overload resolution unless
r
has the same reduced form as*this
.template <intmax_t N2, intmax_t D2> ratio& operator=(const ratio<N2, D2>& r);Effects: None.
Returns:
*this
.Remarks: This operator shall not participate in overload resolution unless
r
has the same reduced form as*this
.Change 21.4.4 [ratio.arithmetic]
Implementations may use other algorithms to compute these values. If overflow occurs, a diagnostic shall be issued.
template <class R1, class R2> struct ratio_add { typedef see below type; };The nested typedef
type
shall be a synonym forratio<T1, T2>::type
whereT1
has the valueR1::num * R2::den + R2::num * R1::den
andT2
has the valueR1::den * R2::den
.template <class R1, class R2> struct ratio_subtract { typedef see below type; };The nested typedef
type
shall be a synonym forratio<T1, T2>::type
whereT1
has the valueR1::num * R2::den - R2::num * R1::den
andT2
has the valueR1::den * R2::den
.template <class R1, class R2> struct ratio_multiply { typedef see below type; };The nested typedef
type
shall be a synonym forratio<T1, T2>::type
whereT1
has the valueR1::num * R2::num
andT2
has the valueR1::den * R2::den
.template <class R1, class R2> struct ratio_divide { typedef see below type; };The nested typedef
type
shall be a synonym forratio<T1, T2>::type
whereT1
has the valueR1::num * R2::den
andT2
has the valueR1::den * R2::num
.
[ 2010-03-27 Howard adds: ]
Daniel brought to my attention the recent addition of the typedef
type
to the FCD N3092:typedef ratio type;This issue was discussed in Pittsburgh, and the decision there was to accept the typedef as proposed and move to Review. Unfortunately the issue was accidently applied to the FCD, and incorrectly. The FCD version of the typedef refers to
ratio<N, D>
, but the typedef is intended to refer toratio<num, den>
which in general is not the same type.I've updated the wording to diff against N3092.
[Batavia: NAD EditorialResolved - see rationale below]
Rationale:
Already fixed in working draft
Proposed resolution:
Add to 21.4.3 [ratio.ratio] synopsis
template <intmax_t N, intmax_t D = 1> class ratio { public: static constexpr intmax_t num; static constexpr intmax_t den; typedef ratio<num, den> type; };