[
Example 3:
Here is an example in which different parameter/argument pairs produce
inconsistent template argument deductions:
template<class T> void f(T x, T y) { }
struct A { };
struct B : A { };
void g(A a, B b) {
f(a,b);
f(b,a);
f(a,a);
f(b,b);
}
Here is an example where two template arguments are deduced from a
single function parameter/argument pair
. This can lead to conflicts
that cause type deduction to fail:
template <class T, class U> void f( T (*)( T, U, U ) );
int g1( int, float, float);
char g2( int, float, float);
int g3( int, char, float);
void r() {
f(g1);
f(g2);
f(g3);
}
Here is an example where the exception specification of a function type
is deduced:
template<bool E> void f1(void (*)() noexcept(E));
template<bool> struct A { };
template<bool B> void f2(void (*)(A<B>) noexcept(B));
void g1();
void g2() noexcept;
void g3(A<true>);
void h() {
f1(g1);
f1(g2);
f2(g3);
}
Here is an example where a qualification conversion applies between the
argument type on the function call and the deduced template argument type:
template<class T> void f(const T*) { }
int* p;
void s() {
f(p);
}
Here is an example where the template argument is used to instantiate
a derived class type of the corresponding function parameter type:
template <class T> struct B { };
template <class T> struct D : public B<T> {};
struct D2 : public B<int> {};
template <class T> void f(B<T>&) {}
void t() {
D<int> d;
D2 d2;
f(d);
f(d2);
}
—
end example]